UN Watch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
United Nations Watch
UN Watch logo.JPG
Type Non-governmental organization[1]
Founded 1993[1]
Key people Alfred H. Moses, Chair;[1]
Per Ahlmark, David A. Harris, Co-Chairs;[1]
Hillel Neuer, Executive Director[2]
Method(s) United Nations,[1] Human rights[1] and struggle against anti-Semitism[3]
Motto "Monitoring the United Nations, Promoting Human Rights"[4]
Website UN Watch Homepage

UN Watch is a Geneva-based non-governmental organization whose stated mission is "to monitor the performance of the United Nations by the yardstick of its own Charter".[1] It is an accredited NGO in Special Consultative Status to the UN Economic and Social Council and an Associate NGO to the UN Department of Public Information.[5] It is affiliated with the American Jewish Committee.[6][7]

UN Watch has been active in combating perceived human rights abuses in Democratic Republic of the Congo and Darfur, perceived anti-Israel and antisemitic sentiment in the UN,[8][9] and monitoring the qualifications of candidate countries to United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) elections. It has been a strong critic of the UNHRC, asserting that many of its members have poor human rights records themselves. UN Watch has described the council as equally bad as or worse than its forerunner, the defunct[10] United Nations Commission on Human Rights.[11]

The group has been praised by former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan,[12][13] and the Director General of the UN Office in Geneva Sergei Ordzhonikidze has acknowledged "the valuable work of UN Watch in support of the just application of values and principles of the United Nations Charter and support for human rights for all."[14] Agence France-Presse has described UN Watch both as a group which "champion[s] human rights worldwide"[15] and as "a lobby group with strong ties to Israel".[16]


UN Watch was founded in 1993 under the chairmanship of Morris Berthold Abram. Abram served as the Chairman of the United Negro College Fund and President of Brandeis University. Abram was active in community affairs as President of the American Jewish Committee (1963–1968); Chairman of the National Conference on Soviet Jewry (1983–1988); and Chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations (1986–1989).[17]

Abram supported the UN as an institution. In 1999, Abram delivered a speech to the U.S. Congress on the subject of the treatment of Israel by the United Nations in which he said "UN Watch categorically supports the UN as an indispensable institution. The US should pay its past dues to the UN as a matter of national honor and in recognition of the UN's importance. In spite of the UN's flaws, it is inconceivable that the US withhold support from the only truly global organization in such an interdependent world."[18][19]

Structure and status[edit]

UN Watch participates at the UN as an accredited NGO in Special Consultative Status to the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and as an Associate NGO to the UN Department of Public Information (DPI). It is affiliated with the American Jewish Committee, a NGO established in 1906, which was a pioneer advocate of the UN Charter's inclusion of international human rights guarantees, and the creation of the post of a High Commissioner of Human Rights.[20]

UN Watch has participated in the following UN activities: the Commission on Human Rights, a Panel Discussion on the United Nations and the Middle East, a Panel Discussion on Proposals to Reform the Commission on Human Rights, the Sub-Commission for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, and the Working Group on Minorities. A UN Watch seminar in Geneva featured a tour of the Palais des Nations, a visit to the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Museum, and attendance at a meeting of the Committee Against Torture (CAT) with briefings from the Committee's Vice Chair.[21]

In October 2008, UNHCR listed the organization as having a staff of six.[22] UN Watch had 110 members in 2007, geographically distributed as follows: 56% from Europe, 38% from North America, and 4% from Oceania. UN Watch’s newsletter on UN issues now reaches nearly 5,000 subscribers around the world.[21]

Commentary from the group has appeared in BBC,[23] Al Jazeera,[24] Reuters,[25] Washington Post,[26] Agence France-Presse,[27] Voice of America,[28] The Jerusalem Post,[29] Fox News,[30] JTA,[31] and others.

Board and funding[edit]

Current board members include:[32]

UN Watch is funded by private individual donations and charitable foundations.[21]

Positions and activities[edit]



In 2008, the post of United Nations special rapporteur for the Congo was eliminated by the United Nations Human Rights Council. The elimination was done with the support of Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, Russia and other countries, following a request by the Congolese administration of President Joseph Kabila. According to a subsequent report prepared by the office of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, both government and rebel forces proceeded to carry out mass killings, rape and torture. In November of that year, UN Watch called on the UNHRC to apologize for abolishing the post, and stated that the UNHRC should be held to account for the move, given the atrocities people there were enduring. UN Watch Executive Director Hillel Neuer said in a statement, "Morally, those countries (on the Council) who were behind the elimination of the monitoring mandate in March ought now to apologise to the victims of Congo... We will never know how many lives could have been saved if the Council, deferring to Congo's government, had not caused this unconscionable protection gap which slashed an early-warning mechanism just when the victims needed it most." Other rights groups called for the re-establishment of the post.[35]

On 1 December 2009, following atrocities in the eastern Congolese province of North Kivu, the UNHRC condemned abuses against civilians in Congo. UN Watch said it was hoping to see a reassignment of a UN rights expert to the region, and said abuses "making eastern Congo a living hell" needed to be properly investigated.[36] UN Watch said a total of 50 groupings had signed the appeal to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and human rights chief Navi Pillay, asking to restore the post of UN rights monitor there.[37]


UN Watch chaired the NGO Activist Summit For Darfur in 2007.[38]

On 27 April 2008, UN Watch joined human rights organizations around the world in launching a "Justice for Darfur" campaign. The organizations behind the campaign included Amnesty International, Human Rights First and Human Rights Watch. The campaign called on the United Nations Security Council, regional organizations and national governments to pressure Sudan to cooperate with the International Criminal Court, and to arrest suspected war criminals Ali Kushayb and Ahmad Harun. The Sudanese government had refused to surrender either suspect to the Court, and had in fact promoted Harun to the position of State Minister for Humanitarian Affairs.[39]


UN Watch commended the US, France and other democracies for their “forceful criticism” of Iran’s human rights record at a UN hearing in Geneva's UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in February 2010. At the same time, UN Watch executive director Hillel Neuer cautioned that the outcome of the council session could be limited to a “toothless” report to be adopted.[40]


In the wake of the January 2010 Haiti earthquake, the UN Human Rights Council's 47 members unanimously passed a resolution that expressed concern about rights abuses in the wake of the quake and urged the government and aid groups to protect children from violence and exploitation. UN Watch slammed the UN Human Rights Council's two-day special session on Haiti as "a harmful waste of the organization's precious time, resources, and moral capital," adding that the council "has no budget, authority or expertise on humanitarian aid" and "ignores more pressing human rights problems".[41]


Following Switzerland’s 2009 vote to ban minarets, UN Watch stated that it was particularly embarrassed by the fact and that it will work toward its repeal. The NGO's director Hillel Neuer said that banning of Muslim structures by a government is wrongful discrimination.[42]

UNHRC Elections[edit]

Along with Freedom House, UN Watch has opposed the candidacies of states with poor human rights records for the United Nations Human Rights Council. The 2006 UN resolution establishing the council requires that, in electing states to the panel, UN member states "shall take into account the contribution of candidates to the promotion and protection of human rights."[43]


In May 2007, UN Watch and Freedom House submitted a joint report on an election to the United Nations Human Rights Council, stating that candidates Angola, Belarus, Egypt and Qatar were unfit to sit on the human rights body, because they themselves violated rights. The report said that the four countries "are authoritarian regimes with negative UN voting records (on rights issues) and are not qualified to be Council members". The report further described candidates Slovenia, Denmark, Italy and the Netherlands as "well qualified" for the Council, and called candidates Bolivia, India, Indonesia, Madagascar, Nicaragua, the Philippines and South Africa as "questionable".[11]


In May 2008, UN Watch and Freedom House called on the UN General Assembly to vote against candidates Bahrain, Gabon, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zambia for poor human rights records. According to Human Rights Watch, Sri Lanka's candidacy was also opposed by a coalition of more than 20 nongovernmental organizations around the world, as well as three Nobel Peace Prize laureates, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, Desmond Tutu of South Africa, and Adolfo Perez Esquivel of Argentina.[43]


In May 2009, UN Watch and Freedom House again submitted a joint report on a UNHRC election. The report described candidates China, Cuba and Saudi Arabia as "the worst of the worst" in terms of human rights. The report also described candidates Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Djibouti and Russia as "not qualified", and Bangladesh, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria and Senegal as "questionable". UN Watch and Freedom House described the council's record for its first three years as poor. They stated that Islamic countries with Cuban support rewrote rules for a freedom of expression monitor in a manner that limits expression, and that an "alliance of regressive regimes" succeeded in having the Council cancel human rights investigators for trouble spots such as Belarus, Cuba, Liberia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Darfur. In contrast, they said, the alliance led to the council appointing an investigator who was involved in founding a controversial human rights prize in honor of Muammar al-Gaddafi and another who believes that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job. Hillel Neuer said, "The vision had been that the council would be a voice for victims, but it is now in a state of crisis."[44]


UN Watch expressed alarm over a report that Asian countries might facilitate Iran’s election in May 2010 to the 47-member UNHRC.[40]


UN Watch is credited with leading the campaign to deny Syria's bid for a seat.[45]

Other UN activities[edit]

Durban Review Conference[edit]

On 19 April 2009, the day before the UN Durban Review Conference, UN Watch and other non-governmental organizations hosted the "Geneva Summit for Human Rights, Tolerance and Democracy," in order to raise public awareness to the issues of discrimination and racially-motivated torture. Invited speakers included survivors of the genocide in Rwanda and former dissidents from Iran, Cuba and Myanmar.[46][47] UN Watch also hosted a "Conference Against Racism, Discrimination, and Persecution" in Geneva. Speakers at the latter conference included former Canadian Justice Minister Irwin Cotler, French philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy and former Miss Canada and President of Stop Child Executions Nazanin Afshin Jam.[48][49][50]

Goldstone Report[edit]

UN Watch submitted a 29-page legal petition to the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict requesting the recusal of member Christine Chinkin because she was one of 31 academics and lawyers who had co-signed a letter published in the Sunday Times before being selected for the mission that accused Israel of not complying with international humanitarian and human rights law.[51] The letter described Israel's military offensive in Gaza as "an act of aggression", stating that "invasion and bombardment of Gaza amounts to collective punishment of Gaza’s 1.5m inhabitants contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law", and adding that "the blockade of humanitarian relief, the destruction of civilian infrastructure, and preventing access to basic necessities such as food and fuel, are prima facie war crimes".[52] UN Watch stated that, since Chinkin had already formed and expressed a judgment on the very issues the Mission was meant to investigate, she could not fulfill the impartiality requirement for fact-finding missions.[51] The petition cites authorities of international law, including a 2004 precedent of the international tribunal for Sierra Leone, in which Justice Geoffrey Robertson was disqualified by his fellow judges over the appearance of bias.[53]

The UN Watch request was covered by the Deutsche Presse Agentur and the Khaleej Times[54] and Agence France Presse.[16] UN Watch further noted that in a May 2009 meeting with Geneva NGOs, Chinkin denied that her impartiality was compromised, saying that her statement only addressed jus ad bellum, and not jus in bello; however, according to UN Watch, the statement not only determined that "Israel’s actions amount to aggression, not self-defence," but additionally charged that they were "contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law," and constituted "prima facie war crimes."[55]

The inquiry members rejected the petition and said that the mission investigated whether Israel, Hamas or the Palestinian Authority had unnecessarily caused death or injury to innocent civilians by specific acts of armed conflict that violated international humanitarian law and international human rights law stating "On those issues the letter co-signed by Professor Chinkin expressed no view at all."[56][57] The members further wrote in their reply that the fact-finding mission cannot be considered a judicial or even a quasi-judicial proceeding.[57] Hillel Neuer, director of UN Watch, said that the arguments raised by the mission ignored the well-established set of standards to international fact-finding missions.[58] Goldstone said that the letter signed by Chinkin could have been the grounds for disqualification, had the mission been a judicial inquiry.[59] Two groups, a group of UK lawyers and academics and a group of Canadian lawyers from prominent law firms and human rights organizations, pronounced separately their support for the UN Watch request that Prof. Chinkin be disqualified from the United Nations Human Rights Council’s fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict and expressed their disappointment that the well-founded request was rejected by the mission.[60][61][62] Chinkin's prior statements, the lawyers wrote, "necessarily compromises the integrity of this inquiry and its report".[62]

The Goldstone Report concluded that the Gaza police forces were a civilian police force and "cannot be said to have been taking a direct part in hostilities and thus did not lose their civilian immunity from direct attack as civilians".[63] The report did not "rule out the possibility that there might be individuals in the police force who retain their links to the armed groups" but finds no evidence that the police were part of the Gaza armed forces and that it "could not verify the allegations of membership of armed groups of policemen."[63] UN Watch noted that on this matter the Goldstone Report relied on the testimony of the Gaza police spokesperson Islam Shahwan, whose credibility had been compromised by previous claim that Israel had been targeting the Palestinian population in Gaza by distributing libido-increasing chewing gum, and the mission accepted the interpretation of Shahwan's own words "face the enemy" as meaning "distributing food stuffs".[64]

The mission report stated that in July 2009 it received, through UN Watch, an official preliminary report of the Israeli Government entitled "The operation in Gaza: Factual and Legal Aspects", which outlined the government of Israel’s position on many issues.[65] Hillel Neuer, Executive Director of the UN Watch, charged that the report misrepresented his correspondence with mission chief Richard Goldstone and that he merely sent Goldstone a link to the report published online. Neuer posted a correspondence with the UN and Goldstone on the UN Watch blog to confirm his words.[66] The group further commented that "Israeli public figures who say their country would have benefited by cooperating with the UN Human Rights Council’s 'fact-finding' mission on the Gaza conflict are mistaken", because "Israel’s detailed facts and legal arguments [presented in the Israeli Government report] were either ignored, or summarily dismissed".[66]

Perceived UN anti-Israel bias and antisemitism[edit]

UN Watch is active at the UN in combating perceived anti-Israel and anti-Semitism, and what it calls the selective and politicized treatment of Israel by many UN bodies.[67][68] The group supported former Secretary General Kofi Annan's declared goal of ending the UN's perceived imbalanced treatment of Israel[69] and has been highly critical of the United Nations Human Rights Council,[8][9][70] The Jewish Telegraphic Agency has described U.N. Watch as a pro-Israel organization.[71]

Claudia Rosett quoted UN Watch's director Hillel Neuer who said that since the UN Human Rights Council was launched in mid-2006 and until the beginning of 2010, it issued 33 condemnatory resolutions; of these, half a dozen have concerned Burma and North Korea, while the other 27 have focused on condemning Israel, while absolving its attackers, including the Iranian-backed militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah.[72]

March 2007 UNHRC speech[edit]

On 23 March 2007, UN Watch's Hillel Neuer delivered a harshly critical speech to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), stating that the Council had betrayed the dreams of its founders and become "a nightmare". Neuer charged that the Council ignores human rights abuses worldwide, opting instead to enact "one resolution after another condemning one single state: Israel". He further argued that the Council's stated concern for Palestinian human rights is deceptive, and provided examples where it ignored atrocities against Palestinians "because Israel could not be blamed... The despots who run this Council couldn’t care less about Palestinians, or about any human rights. They seek to demonize Israeli democracy, to delegitimize the Jewish state, to scapegoat the Jewish people."[73]

The UNHRC President, Luis Alfonso De Alba of Mexico, responded by threatening to "remove from the record" the testimony, and said he "would not "express thanks for that statement... I will not tolerate any similar statements in the Council. The way in which members of this Council were referred to, and indeed the way in which the council itself was referred to, all of this is inadmissible."[74][75] The Human Rights Council later stated that the remarks were never actually stricken from the record.[76]

Neuer's speech was praised in a number of editorials and op-ed's. The Wall Street Journal opined that Neuer's candor disrupted the Council's "obfuscation" and "fraudulence".[77] An op-ed writer in The National Post stated that the speech became "a major hit on YouTube".[78] In its editorial, The New York Sun called it a rare "diplomatic moment to remember", and published the full text of his remarks.[73] Alan Gold, an Australian human rights activist, opined Neuer's speech was "a non-government organisation laying bare the mendacity and prejudice of a key UN body."[79]


Sexual exploitation[edit]

UN Watch, the World YWCA, and the World Alliance of YMCAs published a statement against sexual exploitation and child pornography. "Today far too many children are sexually exploited and abused causing life-long damage. More than two million children are exploited in the multibillion-dollar sex industry each year and 1.2 million children are trafficked annually", the statement said.[80]

Robinson Medal of Freedom[edit]

In July 2009, U.S. President Barack Obama awarded Mary Robinson, the former President of Ireland and former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, a Medal of Freedom.[81]

The conferral of the award to Robinson generated a mix of responses. John R. Bolton, a former US Ambassador to the United Nations, opined she should not receive the award due to her opposition to "the security or national interests of the United States".[82] Nancy Rubin, a former U.S ambassador to the UN Human Rights Commission, said Robinson "highlighted the rights of women and children and promoted monitoring and reporting throughout the world" and commented that "as a Jewish American who affirms that defending the human rights of all is a basic tenant of my faith, I wholeheartedly endorse your recognition of Mary Robinson for the narrative of her life."[83] United States Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi,[84] United States Senate Assistant Majority Leader Dick Durbin,[85] and Congressman Michael McMahon of New York[86] welcomed the presenting of the award to Robinson.[87] Forty-five Republican Congressmen sent a letter to President Obama asking him not to confer the award on Robinson, citing "her failed, biased record as United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights". Democratic Congressman Eliot Engel of New York separately called the award "a mistake."[88]

Robinson asserted that in opposing the conferral "certain elements" of the Jewish community had put forward "totally without foundation" allegations in opposition to her receiving the award. In an open letter response to Robinson's comments, Hillel Neuer of UN Watch rejected her claims and criticized her role in the 2001 Durban Conference, stating: "Leadership means taking responsibility. You may not have been the chief culprit of the Durban debacle, but you will always be its preeminent symbol."[88]

Reception history[edit]

Former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has said “I deeply appreciate the valuable work performed by UN Watch. I believe that informed and independent evaluation of the United Nations’ activities will prove a vital source as we seek to adapt the Organization to the needs of a changing world.”[12][13] At the 2006 Centennial Anniversary of the American Jewish Committee, the Director-General of the UN Office in Geneva, Mr. Sergei Ordzhonikidze, praised the work of UN Watch by saying "allow me to also pay tribute to the valuable work of UN Watch in support of the just application of values and principles of the United Nations Charter and support for human rights for all."[14]

Ian Williams, former president of the United Nations Correspondents Association[89] and author of The UN For Beginners,[90] wrote in an opinion piece in The Guardian in 2007 that the main objective of UN Watch "is to attack the United Nations in general, and its human rights council in particular, for alleged bias against Israel". Williams supported UN Watch's condemnation of the UN Human Rights Council as a hypocritical organization, but also accused UN Watch itself of hypocrisy for failing to denounce what he called "manifest Israeli transgressions against the human rights of Palestinians."[91]

The New Republic's Martin Peretz, in a 2007 blog piece, described the organization as "a truth-telling organization.”[92] Claudia Rosett, a journalist-in-residence with the conservative[93][94] Foundation for Defense of Democracies, praised UN Watch as "stalwart and invaluable".[95]

Agence France-Presse has described UN Watch both as "a lobby group with strong ties to Israel"[16] and as a group which "champion[s] human rights worldwide".[15]

An anonymously written profile of Hillel Neuer on Right Web, an online project of the far-left Institute for Policy Studies whose stated aim is "tracking militarists' efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy", calls UN Watch "controversial" and emphasizes its links to Jewish and Israeli groups.[96] A critique of Right Web's profiles by Michael Rubin, writing in Commentary, states that the profiles contain unaddressed inaccuracies and amount to "nonsense".[97]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c d e f g h "''UN Watch'': Mission and History". Unwatch.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  2. ^ "''UN Watch'': Executive Director Hillel Neuer". Unwatch.org. 16 December 2006. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  3. ^ The United nations and Anti-Semitism - 2004-2007 Report Card. Retrieved 19 October 2013. 
  4. ^ UN Watch: Letter to His Excellency Mr. Ban Ki-moon, The Secretary-General of The United Nations. 2 November 2007.
  5. ^ Mission & History, UN Watch
  6. ^ "ACJ Office and Departments". ACJ. Retrieved 19 March 2012. 
  7. ^ "ACJ Activities in Europe". ACJ. Retrieved 19 March 2012. 
  8. ^ a b "Pro-Israel Activists Set To Do Battle At Durban II". Jewish Times. 18 April 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  9. ^ a b By · 8 September 2008 (8 September 2008). "''Jewish Telegraphic Agency'': U.N. rights chief praises Durban II". Jta.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  10. ^ "UN creates new human rights body", BBC 15 March 2006
  11. ^ a b Groups call 4 countries unfit for UN rights body, Reuters 7 May 2007
  12. ^ a b "UN Watch, AJC Seal Partnership". Charitywire.com. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  13. ^ a b "''Central Tibetan Administration'': UN Watch urges UN to discuss human rights violations in Tibet". Tibet.net. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  14. ^ a b "''The United Nations Office at Geneva'': The Centennial Anniversary of the American Jewish Committee". Unog.ch. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  15. ^ a b May 6, 2008, NGOs say five nations unfit to serve on UN rights body, AFP 6 May 2008
  16. ^ a b c "''Agence France Presse'': UN Gaza probe chief underlines balanced approach". Google. 7 July 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  17. ^ "''UN Watch'': Founder: Morris B. Abram". Unwatch.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  18. ^ United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations. 1999. The treatment of Israel by the United Nations [microform] : hearing before the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, first session, 14 July 1999 U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office, Washington : 1999
  20. ^ "Human Rights – American Jewish Committee". Ajc.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  21. ^ a b c "UN: Quadrennial reports 2002–2005 submitted through the Secretary-General pursuant to Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31". United Nations. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  22. ^ United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Non-governmental Organization Directory (2008-10-01). "UNHCR – UN Watch / United Nations Watch". United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Retrieved 2009-12-03.  (A permanent archive of the material may be found here [1].)
  23. ^ "Human Rights and Wrongs at the UN". BBC. 21 January 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  24. ^ Kristen Saloomey in New York. "Debate rages over UN rights council". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  25. ^ "''Reuters'': UN urges China to protect human rights as state denies charges". Worldbulletin.net. 9 February 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  26. ^ Rifkin, Ira (1 April 2009). "Guest Voices: Speaking Truth to the UN Human Rights Council". Washington Post. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  27. ^ "UN rights council divided over Sri Lanka". Mg.co.za. AFP. 26 May 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  28. ^ Washington D.C   (6 May 2009). "UN Human Rights Council Candidates Raise Concerns". Voice of America. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  29. ^ Gold vs Goldstone Jerusalem Post:
  30. ^ "U.S. Taxpayers Pay Millions to Keep Despots Safe at U.N". Fox News. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  31. ^ 12 March 2009 (12 March 2009). "U.N. watchdog slams religious defamation resolution". Jta.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  32. ^ "Missing and History". Unwatch.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  33. ^ "Covington & Burling LLP | Biographies | Alfred H. Moses". Cov.com. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  34. ^ "UN Watch Appoints New Executive Director – American Jewish Committee". Ajc.org. 26 March 2004. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  35. ^ Rights group calls for U.N. apology over Congo post, Reuters 26 November 2008
  36. ^ U.N. Human Rights Council condemns abuses in Congo, Reuters 1 December 2009
  37. ^ Groups call for UN rights monitor for Congo, Reuters, 23 December 2009
  38. ^ Globe For Darfur: Reports & Briefs

    UN Watch hosted a panel of distinguished speakers, including a Darfur survivor and a UN expert, at its Activist Summit on Darfur today at the UN Office in Geneva

  39. ^ "Justice for Darfur" Campaign Launched, Amnesty International 25 April 2008
  40. ^ a b Iran under fire at UNHRC, Jerusalem Post. 16 February 2010
  41. ^ UN rights body concerned for Haiti's children, AP, 28 January 2010
  42. ^ A Swiss Ban on Minarets, New York Times, 18 December 2009
  43. ^ a b States vie for seats on disputed UN rights body, Reuters 21 May 2008
  44. ^ Oppressors running for UN rights council: Groups, Montreal Gazette 5 May 2009
  45. ^ Jordana Horn, "Syria may drop bid for Human Rights Council seat", Jerusalem Post, 10 May 2011.
  46. ^ Yitzhak Benhorin, Sharansky, Wiesel to help counter 'Durban II' conference, Ynet 13 April 2009
  47. ^ Alternate Durban conference held in Geneva, JTA 19 April 2009
  48. ^ Tovah Lazaroff, 'I'm a Zionist': Activists protest in Geneva, Jerusalem Post. 23 April 2009
  49. ^ Michael J. Jordan, Why the US will boycott global racism conference, Christian Science Monitor 19 April 2009
  50. ^ Adena Philips, The other conference on racism – the one the UN should have held, National Post. 24 April 2009
  51. ^ a b "Request To Disqualify Prof. Christine Chinkin From Un Fact Finding Mission On The Gaza Conflict" (PDF). Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  52. ^ Israel’s bombardment of Gaza is not self-defence – it’s a war crime, The Sunday Times, 11 January 2009.
  53. ^ NGO: Academic should quit Cast Lead inquiry, Jerusalem Post. 23 August 2009
  54. ^ "UN’s Goldstone completes public hearings on Gaza conflict". Khaleejtimes.com. 8 July 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  55. ^ LSE Law Professor Urged to Step Down from U.N Gaza Inquiry over Bias, UN Watch, 20 August 2009.
  56. ^ Dispute over 'biased' Gaza inquiry professor, TheJC.com, 27 August 2009.
  57. ^ a b U.N. Goldstone inquiry rejects ’so-called petition of UN Watch’; denies mission is quasi-judicial, UN Watch, 30 August 2009
  58. ^ Gold vs Goldstone, Jerusalem Post. 11 November 2009
  59. ^ Goldstone walks a fine line in an ancient war zone, BusinessDay, 4 August 2009.
  60. ^ Lawyers, watchdog allege Goldstone bias, Jerusalem Post. 14 September 2009
  61. ^ 30 Canadian lawyers challenge biased UN Goldstone report, CFP, 16 September 2009
  62. ^ a b U.N.’s Imminent Gaza Report Challenged by 50 U.K. & Canadian Lawyers for ‘Bias’, UN Watch, 13 September 2009
  63. ^ a b Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, UNHRC, 15 September 2009
  64. ^ Goldstone report cites same Hamas witness who claims Israel distributes libido-increasing gum, UN Watch, 29 September 2009.
  65. ^ UNHCR: Human Rights in Palestine and Other Occupied Arab Territories, page 45, para. 173
  66. ^ a b How my email to Goldstone was twisted by his report, UN Watch blog, 19 January 2010
  67. ^ "UN Watch: Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)". Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  68. ^ [2][dead link]
  69. ^ "Annan Made the Nations a Little Less United Against Israel –". Forward.com. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  70. ^ "''National Public Radio'': Zionism Debate Clouds U.N. Racism Forum". Npr.org. 12 March 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  71. ^ By · 8 September 2008 (8 September 2008). "''JTA'': U.N. rights chief praises Durban II". Jta.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  72. ^ Don't Let Iran On The Human Rights Council, Forbes-Asia, 11 February 2010
  73. ^ a b "‘I Will Not Express Thanks'". The New York Sun. March 30, 2007. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  74. ^ Fendel, Hillel (28 March 2007). "UN Council Chief Doesn't Like Message, Threatens Messenger". Israelnationalnews.com. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  75. ^ Testimony at the UN, UN Watch
  76. ^ "United Nations: Highlight of the Noon Briefing". United Nations. 30 March 2007. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  77. ^ Your U.N. at Work, Wall Street Journal 30 March 2007
  78. ^ Degeneration in all but reputation, National Post 23 May 2009
  79. ^ "New name, but the shame is still the same", The Australian,
  80. ^ YMCA: Joint NGO Statement on Sexual Exploitation and Child Pornography[dead link]
  81. ^ "''White House'': Remarks By The President At The Medal Of Freedom Ceremony". Whitehouse.gov. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  82. ^ Mary Robinson’s Medal of Freedom, WSJ, 10 August 2009
  83. ^ "Nancy Rubin — Open Letter to President Obama". Nancy Rubin. 12 August 2009. Retrieved 12 August 2009. 
  84. ^ United States Speaker of the House: Pelosi Statement on Presidential Medal of Freedom Recipients[dead link]
  86. ^ Congressman Michael E. McMahon: McMahon Congratulates Medal of Freedom Recipient Mary Robinson
  87. ^ "Congress of the United States". 11 August 2009. 
  88. ^ a b "''Jerusalem Post'': Despite critics, White House honors Robinson". Jerusalem Post. 12 August 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  89. ^ "''United Nations'': Remarks Prepared for Delivery at the United Nations Correspondents Association Dinner". United Nations. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  90. ^ A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z. "Ian Williams". The Nation. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  91. ^ Casting the first stone The Guardian, 4 April 2007)
    Ian Williams Profile
  92. ^ The New Republic Online, 18 June 2007[dead link]
  93. ^ "''United Press International'': Analysts: Iran deserves targeted sanctions". Upi.com. 14 August 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  94. ^ "''Pittsburgh Post-Gazette'': Witnesses criticize military commissions at congressional panel". Post-gazette.com. 9 July 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  95. ^ Claudia Rosett (20 June 2007). "National Review Online, June 20, 2007". Article.nationalreview.com. Retrieved 7 December 2011. 
  96. ^ Hillel Neuer, Institute for Policy Studies/Right Web, 1 December 2011, retrieved 19 March 2012 
  97. ^ Michael Rubin, Why is PBS Linking to Fake Biographies of Conservatives?, Commentary 13-03-2011

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]